advertentie
logo
advertentie
Waarom SIOE Nederland uit de lucht werd gehaald.

DUNS OURAY - 06 FEBRUARI 2008


Hier is het volledige dossier. Oordeel zelf!

Ik stuurde een mail aan de provider:


Hi Toni,
 
My name is Duns Ouray, I am an editor for the Dutch blog 'The Free People' http://www.hetvrijevolk.com/
 
It has come to my attention that you have taken SIOE Nederland offline (http://sioenederland.wordpress.com/). You claim to have received "several complaints" about "hateful or racially or ethnically objectionable content". Most interestingly, you claim to have received "complaints from the Dutch government".
 
I speak Dutch, and I have visited SIOE Nederland. I have never come upon "hateful or racially or ethnically objectionable content". I would be very surprised if this were true.
 
Also, it strikes me as bizarre that the Dutch government would complain to the provider about the content of a site. Think about it. Wouldn't it be appropriate for the Dutch government to pursue legal action, rather than try to get a site offline through complaints?
 
If it really were the Dutch government complaining, without a court order, wouldn't that open them up to sizable legal liabilities? Not to speak of a fall-out in public relations?
 
I am hoping you will answer the questions below:
 
 - Could you show me the complaint that you have gotten, in particular the one from the Dutch government?
 - Could you show me what hateful or racially or ethnically objectionable content has been posted on the site?
 
Kindest,
 
Duns Ouray

Daarom kreeg ik dit antwoord:

Hi Duns,

Thank you for writing. We suspended the blog based on the following complaint:

Dear Abuse Department,

I write you on behalf of the Dutch Complaints Bureau for Discrimination on
the Internet.

The Dutch public can file a complaint at the Complaints Bureau if they
encounter hateful or discriminatory content on the 'Dutch part' of the
Internet. The Complaints Bureau then locates the content and tests it
against Dutch non-discrimination legislation. If the content is on the
'Dutch part' of the Internet and is in violation of Dutch law, we send a
request for removal of the illegal content.

We recently received a complaint about the following website:
http://sioenederland.wordpress.com

This website is full of racist, hateful and defamatory content against
muslims. I will copy and translate a few of the remarks that can be seen on
this site.

http://sioenederland.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/el-tawheed-uiteindelijk-is-ons-ideaal-een-islamitische-maatschappij/

"Zolang er geen enkele moslim of een groep moslims opstaat om te zeggen dat
zij niet akkoord gaan met de radicale haat jegens het Westen, die keer op
keer uitgesproken wordt in heel Europa, is het niet anders te concluderen
dat moslims achter het standpunt staan van El Tawheed: het ideaal
verwezenlijken door van Nederland een islamitische maatschappij te maken."

"As long as neither a single muslim or a group of muslims stands up to say
they don't agree with the radicale hate towards the West, we have to
conclude they agree with El Tawheed: to realize the highest goal, by
transforming the Netherlands into an Islamic society."


http://sioenederland.wordpress.com/2008/01/22/nederland-opnieuw-in-beroering-door-anti-koran-film/

“You can see the evil coming up from Muslims. They do the same as what
Hitler did before ­ they say the same things about Jews and homosexuals.”

"DE MOSLIMS DOEN ZO VAN” WIJ WONEN NU HIER IN JULLIE LAND MAAR WIJ DOEN wel
ALLES WAT WE GEWEND WAREN IN ONS EIGEN LAND EN DAT HOUDEN WE ZO! WE BOUWEN
HIER ZO VEEL MOGELIJK MOSKEEN ,ONZE VROUWEN MOGEN NIET NAAR BUITEN,ONZE
MANNEN MOGEN WEL DE NEDERLANDSE MEISJES MISBRUIKEN MAAR NIET MEE TROUWEN
(WANT voor onze eigen BRUIDEN, REIZEN WE liever NAAR ONS BERGJE)
WIJ MOGEN LEKKER ONZE VROUWEN SLAAN,FIJN HE?DAT DE MOSLIM MAN NIET ZELF DIE
PAK SLAAG KRIJGT."

"Muslims don't integrate. They want to built as much mosques as possible,
detain their wives, abuse dutch girls and bang their women."


http://sioenederland.wordpress.com/2008/01/17/moslim-immigratie-kan-leiden-tot-polarisering/

"Ten derde, de moslims stellen ook na langdurig contact hun mening over
westerlingen niet bij (verdorven, materialistisch). We zijn getuige van een
mislukt sociaal experiment op enorme schaal."

"Thirdly, muslims don't adjust their opinion about people from the west,
not even after a long period. We are witnesses of a failed social experiment."


http://sioenederland.wordpress.com/2008/01/08/tolerantie-polarisering-en-taalvervuiling/

"Moslims tolereren geen beledigingen"

"Muslims don't tolerate any offence"


http://sioenederland.wordpress.com/2008/01/02/links-nederland-capituleert/

"Er is slechts één groep in Nederland die intolerant naar de samenleving is
en dat is de moslimgemeenschap. Hierover is géén discussie mogenlijk, dit
is een feit."

"There's just one group in the netherlanfds which is intolerant towards
society and that's the muslim community. No doubt. That's a fact."


http://sioenederland.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/wie-beledigd-nu-wie/


Wie beledigt nu wie:

De grootste beledigingen van de islam cq moslim jegens de Nederlandse
maatschappij:

- de intolerantie van moslims jegens de open Nederlandse maatschappij.

- het weigeren van integreren in de Nederlandse samenleving.

- de minachting voor onze wetten.

- de minachting voor iedereen die geen moslim is.

- de weigering afstand te nemen van Sharia.

- een Westerse niet islamistische samenleving dwingen respect te hebben
voor hetgeen hier niet hoort.

- vrije mening en vrije expressie proberen te reduceren!!!!!

- afdwingen van respect door moslims van niet-moslims.

 

"Muslims are offending dutch society because:

- they don't tolerate the dutch open society

- they refuse to integrate

- they look down upon our society and laws

- they refuse to take distance from the sharia

- they oblige the western society to have respect for taht wich doesn't
belong here

- they try to reduce freedom of speech and expression

- they force to get respect from non-muslims"


http://sioenederland.wordpress.com/2007/11/03/toespraak-herdenking-theo-van-gogh/

"THEO VAN GOGH IS VERMOORD OMDAT ER EEN BEVOLKINGSGROEP IN NEDERLAND NIET
MET KRITIEK WEET OM TE GAAN EN BOVENDIEN GEEN KRITIEK ACCEPTEERD."

"Theo van Gogh is killed because some population group in the Netherlands
can't deal with critisism."

 

These hateful and racist remarks are just a few examples of the material
that can be found on this extremely racist website.

In your Terms of Service you state the following conditions:

the Content is not obscene, libelous or defamatory, hateful or racially or
ethnically objectionable, and does not violate the privacy or publicity
rights of any third party;

Considering the nature of the remarks and the fact that the remarks on this
site are not only in violation of your Terms of Service, but are also in
violation of the Dutch Penal Code, i therefore request the removal of this
website.

For more information about the Dutch Complaints Bureau for Discrimination
on the Internet: http://www.meldpunt.nl/indexe.php3

Kind regards,

J. van der Krogt

Dutch Complaints Bureau for Discrimination on the Internet.


Waarop ik deze repliek heb gestuurd:

Hi Toni,
 
Thanks for your quick reply.
 
Let me note something crucial. "The Dutch Complaints Bureau for Discrimination on the Internet" is NOT the Dutch government. It is an independent foundation.
 
In my personal opinion, it is a foundation of political zealots. They attempt to silence people who do not share their islamist views, by wearing them down with legal action and semi-legal complaints.
 
The complaint they filed you with is something that I would qualify as semi-legal action. Or policitical activism.
 
Also, their translations are not fair and complete.
 
I have had dealing with them before (about content on my website). They hold that any general remarks about muslims are discriminatory. Simply, because it generalizes the adherents of a religion.
 
You will find that this is the core complaint about the quotations they send you. I do not believe that a mere generalization is discriminatory, and neither does the American law (which I believe applies here).
 
But maybe you beg to differ?
 
Kindest regards,
 
Duns Ouray

en dan deze dupliek ontving:

> Also, their translations are not fair and complete.


Can you be more specific?

We don't speak Dutch and have relied on the accuracy of their translation.

Thanks,
Toni


en dat als volgt heb gespecificeerd:

Hi Tonie,
 
here are some examples:
 
 
The quotation:
"Ten derde, de moslims stellen ook na langdurig contact hun mening over
westerlingen niet bij (verdorven, materialistisch). We zijn getuige van een
mislukt sociaal experiment op enorme schaal."
 
is translated by MDI as:
"Thirdly, muslims don't adjust their opinion about people from the west,
not even after a long period. We are witnesses of a failed social experiment."
 
But should be:
"Thirdly, even after extended contact muslims don't adjust their opinion about people from the west, (muslims hold them to be materialic and depraved). We are witness to a failed social experiment on a grand scale."
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
 
The quotation:
"Moslims tolereren geen beledigingen"
 
is translated by MDI as:
"Muslims don't tolerate any offence"
 
But should be:
"Muslims do not accept offensive remarks."
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
 
The quotation:
"Er is slechts één groep in Nederland die intolerant naar de samenleving is
en dat is de moslimgemeenschap. Hierover is géén discussie mogenlijk, dit
is een feit."
 
is translated by MDI as:
"There's just one group in the netherlanfds which is intolerant towards
society and that's the muslim community. No doubt. That's a fact."
 
But should be:
"There is only one group in the Netherland which behaves intolerantly towards society, en this is the muslim-community. Even talking about this is an impossibility, it is a fact."
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
 
The quotation:
"Wie beledigt nu wie:
 
De grootste beledigingen van de islam cq moslim jegens de Nederlandse
maatschappij:"
 
is translated by MDI as:
"Muslims are offending dutch society because:"
 
But should be:
"Well, who is offending whom?:
 
Islam and/or muslims offend Dutch society as follows:"



We houden u op de hoogte van de ontwikkelingen.